Thursday, August 13, 2009

Health Care Reform

Here's my two cents worth (more like a dollar's worth). The United States is the only high-income nation out of 27 that does not have universal health coverage/socialized medicine. Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Australia, Great Britain, among others, have it. America now pays about twice as much per person for health care as other industrialized nations, and yet we have the lowest life expectancy among those same nations (click here for source). According to the CIA and United Nations, the U.S. is ranked 45th in life expectancy, while Canada is 14th and Japan is 3rd. I'm not saying we should copy what other nations are doing, but we certainly should take a good look at it. And I believe that is what the government is trying to accomplish with the town hall meetings. 


The United States already has some socialized programs, many of which were/are the best in the world. Even our military has socialized medicine. Some say it's the best, and others say it's the worst. But since I have never served in the military, I do not know whom to believe. I believe many of the socialized programs in America have suffered due to a lack of funding. I think there has been a trend toward much of our government (both Republican and Democrat) being more concerned with serving the needs of private interests (big business) than the needs of the public. 


I lived in a country with socialized medicine for four years (Japan, the world's 2nd largest economy), and I never paid for a doctor's visit. The only thing I paid for was medicine, and it was very cheap. I didn't see any difference in care, but I can only speak from the perspective of a relatively healthy adult in his 20s while living in Japan. My wife's grandmother recently passed away in Japan at the age of 93, and according to her family, she received quality health care. 


I am not one to rush to take sides, but I do not believe we can continue down the path we are on without some reform. My wife and I and her employer pay a certain amount (not cheap) to an insurance company each month for coverage. On top of the monthly insurance premium, there is a deductible. And there is also the co-payment for each visit to a doctor. And then, there is the issue of pre-existing conditions not covered by the insurance company. And on top of all that, if your insurance plan has a lifetime limit (and most do), the insurance company will stop paying if you are unfortunate enough to get an expensive illness and run up the bills. And the number one reason people go bankrupt is that they can't pay their medical bills. At the very least, the government should eliminate pre-existing conditions and lifetime limits. 


For the record, the reform proposed by the Obama administration is not full-blown socialism (but instead a public option) (source), and there are no "death panels" (source). This doesn't mean that the Obama administration or others supporting health care reform hasn't made false claims; they have (source). 


I am not a big fan of Michael Moore, but his documentary "Sicko" about health care is worth a look. 


Now is the time to stand up and let your voice be heard no matter which side you support. We do live in a democratic republic, after all. If we were truly communist/socialist as some have suggested, the bill would have already been passed behind closed doors without any public discussion. 

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

It's Official!

Congratulations President Barack Hussein Obama! Best wishes to you and your administration.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

It's A New Day!

The people have spoken. What a phenomenal victory for Obama! The best way to put this historic victory into perspective is by looking at some facts:

First minority president in U.S. history
Most votes ever for any president: 69 million (53%)
Largest percentage of popular vote for Democrat since 1964
Largest percentage of popular vote for any president since 1988
Margin of victory: 10 million (7%)
States won: 28
Republican States Won: 9
Electoral votes: 365 (68%)
Control of House: Democrats +78
Control of Senate: Democrats +17 (1 race pending)
The World Celebrated Obama's Victory: click here, here, and here.

Comparison with Gore (2000):
Gore only won 20 states, 266 electoral votes, 48.4% of popular vote (51 million)
Obama +8 states, +99 electoral votes, +4.2% of popular vote (15 million)
Obama outperformed Gore in 45 states
Gore didn't even win his home state of Tennessee

Comparison with Bush II (2000):
Bush won 30 states, 271 electoral votes, 47.9% of popular vote (51 million)
Bush + 2 states
Obama +94 electoral votes, +4.7% of popular vote (15 million)

Comparison with Kerry (2004):
Kerry only won 19 states, 252 electoral votes, 48.3% of popular vote (59 million)
Obama +9 states, +113 electoral votes, +4.3% of popular vote (7 million)
Obama outperformed Kerry in 44 states

Comparison with Bush II (2004):
Bush won 31 states, 286 electoral votes, 50.7% of popular vote (62 million)
Bush +3 states
Obama +79 electoral votes, +1.9% of popular vote (4 million)

Bush II claimed a mandate with his win in 2004, so I guess Obama has a super-mandate with his victory in 2008. Unfortunately, the next four years will be difficult for Obama. Here are just a few reasons:
Record deficits and debt
Unemployment rate 6.5% (highest since 1994)
47 million uninsured Americans
Failing banks and insurance companies
Falling stock market and retirement funds
"Our entire economy is in danger." Not my words, not the media's words, but President Bush's words.
$10 billion per month of taxpayer's money to an unneccesary war
4000+ US soldiers dead in Iraq

Lackluster campaigns by Gore and Kerry in 2000 and 2004 paved the way for an Obama victory in 2008. And Bush's bad judgment and lack of leadership also helped, not to mention McCain's embrace of Bush and his administration. It's certainly nice to have Obama as our President, but Gore could have saved many Americans a lot of pain and heartache if he had just taken care of business in 2000. But like the Rolling Stones said, "You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes well you just might find.....you get what you need."

Click here for post-election political cartoons.

PS. This will be my last post for a while, especially from the political perspective. This doesn't mean I won't disagree with Obama or his administration. I already have. I simply feel better about the future and direction of our country. Like the title says, "It's A New Day!" Plus, my wife and I have our first little one on the way, so our lives will be too busy to follow the political landscape regularly. Peace and Love.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Congratulations President-Elect Obama!


I really don't know what to say. I admire John McCain. As I've mentioned before, he is a good man and I wish him well.

To Barack Hussein Obama...Congratulations! You ran a well-organized campaign, you stayed on message, you stayed calm, you worked hard, and you won.

The face of America is no longer just that of white males. The face of America is a composite of all the people who live here, and it's my hope that a female will win the presidency next time. Best wishes to Hillary Rodham Clinton and all women fighting for equality in this country.

More reflection to come once I've had time for all of this to sink in...

Monday, November 03, 2008

Whatever Happens...

it's not the end of the world. Both Barack Obama and John McCain are good men, and I wish them well in the election tomorrow. It's time to let the people speak and may the best candidate win.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Three Scenarios and One Prediction

Scenario #1: Some Democrats have been talking about an Obama landslide (375+ electoral votes). I seriously doubt that will happen. In my opinion, the best Obama can expect to do is 338 to 200.
Click the link below for map:
http://news.yahoo.com/election#1

Scenario #2: The consensus is that McCain is unlikely to win the election. Nonetheless, McCain's path to victory might look something like this: McCain 273 Obama 265.
Click link below for map:
http://news.yahoo.com/election#2

Scenario #3: The final possibility is a worst case scenario for the American people. One that involves settling the winner by means of the US House of Representatives as dictated by the 12th Amendment.
Click the link below for map:
http://news.yahoo.com/election#3

My prediction: Obama 291 (52% popular vote) McCain 247 (47%).
Obama's path to victory has always been hold Kerry states + Iowa, New Mexico, and Colorado. I believe he also picks up Nevada and Virginia. This election always has been and still is a close race. In the end, Obama wins by a margin of victory similar to Bush in 2004.
http://news.yahoo.com/election/myprediction

Thursday, October 09, 2008

"That One"

I didn't watch enough of the debate to determine a winner, so all I have to go on are polls of people who actually watched it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQqjqb95uNc
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/08/politics/2008debates/main4508430.shtml?source=mostpop_story

From what I've watched and gathered, I suspect both candidates did well but not well enough to move the electorate much in either direction. Today we have exactly 28 days until we decide who the next president will be. May the best candidate win.

By the way, his name is Senator Barack Hussein Obama.

PS. Have you checked your 401(k) recently?

Saturday, September 27, 2008

In Retrospect

Following a well-organized and moderated debate (kudos to Jim Lehrer and PBS), I decided to sleep on it before offering any commentary. My initial reaction was that neither candidate did very well. After reading many blog reactions I believe several Obama supporters (including myself) were too critical of his performance. I cannot speak for McCain supporters. To a certain extent I think this is understandable and to be expected, and I don't necessarily believe it's such a bad thing. I believe the most ardent supporters on both sides hold their candidates to stricter, albeit sometimes unrealistic, standards. There's nothing wrong with wanting your candidate to excel, but there really isn't any need for your candidate to try to crush his opponent.

In retrospect, I believe both candidates did what they had to do in the first debate. I think Obama looked, acted, and spoke like someone who could be president. And I believe McCain lived up to (maybe exceeded) expectations considering his reputation for economic issues and the possibility of a debate postponement. And McCain also performed well with regard to national security issues. And as expected, McCain was on the offensive and attacked Obama because he is currently trailing in a majority of national and state polls.

Anyway, I thought both candidates demonstrated knowledge of the issues at hand regardless if anyone agrees with them or not. And I believe McCain, with a few exceptions, was speaking to his base more than Obama. I think this benefits McCain more because this is how Republicans win elections. And that is exactly how they won in 2000 and 2004.

Overall, I thought McCain looked the most uncomfortable on stage. I believe this involves many factors: he's trailing, he realizes he has to play by the Republican playbook to a certain extent, he's admitted he's not very knowledgeable about the economy, and the economy is not very good for a candidate who is from the same party whose had most of the control the last eight years.

Debate Scorecard and winners:
Presentation: Obama
Demeanor: Obama
Knowledge of Issues: Tie
Red Meat: McCain
Expectations: McCain

Overall: Tie
Obama's strengths were overall image and knowledge of issues.
McCain's strengths were meeting expectations and knowledge of issues.

UPDATE: These links are encouraging if you support Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wup4nsIWe8A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALdyDYZiC_8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9fThbEGFBc

Friday, September 12, 2008

In Remembrance


In remembrance and honor of:

Iraqi humans who lost their lives in the Iraq War
Vietnamese humans who lost their lives in the Vietnam War
Japanese humans who lost their lives as the result of two nuclear bombs
African-American humans who lost their lives during 223 years of slavery
Native American humans who lost their lives on the Trail of Tears
All humans who lost their lives in needless wars and experiments

Thursday, September 11, 2008

In Remembrance



In remembrance and honor of those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001.

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Thoughts on Palin

What seemed like an odd pick at first will work out well for McCain. Palin can be the "pit bull" while McCain takes the high road, and she certainly seems willing and able to fill that role. And Palin appeals to the Republican base in ways that McCain never could. She's as anti-abortion as one can get, and she's a lifetime member of the NRA. Palin also presents the image of a Washington outsider who is reform-minded. And I'll even say she comes across as more authentic than most politicians, but her selection and nomination to the ticket is only historic in that it's the first time Republicans have chosen a woman as vice president. The Democrats broke the gender barrier 24 years ago with Geraldine Ferraro.

The McCain campaign keeps pushing that Palin has more executive experience than Obama and Biden combined. If this is in fact true, then she also has more executive experience than McCain.
Personally, I think experience is over-rated. Bush was the governor of a large state for 6 years and a businessman before that. Look where the economy is now. Cheney had tons of foreign policy experience and so did Rumsfeld. Look where their foreign policy experience has taken us. How did we get to our present state of affairs? Lack of experience or bad judgment? I believe it was the result of bad judgment.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

No More Excuses


Obama said what he plans to do, and here is his Blueprint for Change. The ball is now in your hands...what are you going to do?

This is encouraging...


Saturday, August 23, 2008

More on Biden

In an ideal world, Obama could have chosen someone who fits his theme of change more perfectly. Unfortunately, we don't live in an ideal world.

Let's be honest, racism and its by-products are largely generational, and we have plenty of older folks who feel uncomfortable voting for someone they perceive as different. There's no guarantee that those same folks will vote for Obama with Biden on the ticket, but it at least gives him a chance.

Obama is the candidate of change (in more ways than one) and Biden is the person who might make that transition a little easier for some people. Whether or not Obama's strategy works remains to be seen.

Unfortunately, there are some people (young and old) who will probably never vote for Obama no matter who he has on the ticket. In the end, the best cure for race relations in America is to have someone as intelligent and kindhearted as Obama as president. But if he doesn't win in November, it could very well negate some recent gains in race relations.

I'm certainly not advocating that we vote for Obama because of his race. Instead, we should look beyond his race In reality, there is no such thing as a pure race. We are all racial hybrids.

The following is an excerpt from my blog on November 8, 2006:
"When will America elect a minority president? I can't believe we are still asking this question...It's the 21st century, and I think white males have had more than enough time to run the country. Sure, they've accomplished many good things, but they've also had their share of failures. It's time to give someone else a chance to succeed or fail. By the way, did the accomplishments or failures of white males have anything to do with their skin color or gender?"
Obama is qualified to be President of the United States with or without Biden, and his skin color is absolutely irrelevant.

Thoughts on Joe Biden

What makes Biden a good choice?
First, his experience in the Senate and on the Foreign Relations committee. Second, his Catholic heritage allows the ticket to appeal to a large and significant demographic. But the most important aspect is Biden's ability to attack the Republican ticket. In many respects, he is the perfect Attack Dog for a presidential candidate to have. Does he stick his foot in his mouth? Occasionally, but Biden is a seasoned politician, and he will certainly come across as more likeable than Dick Cheney, Al Gore, and Dan Quayle combined. Biden is perhaps one of the most down to earth politicians you will find in Washington DC. He is the least wealthy of all US Senators, and he regularly commutes between his home in Wilmington, Delaware and DC. Biden may have been in DC a long time, but he is by no means the quintessential Washington insider.

To an extent, Biden helps Obama among older whites and the working class. But let's be honest, people who were planning to vote against Obama because he's different are not likely to change their minds because Biden (or anyone else) is on the ticket. However, Biden is likely to help with voters who were leaning toward Obama but were a little unsure of his capacity to lead.

In my opinion VPs don't matter that much when it comes time to vote for President. And historically speaking, the only recent elections in which a VP carried states that had a significant impact were 1960 (Lyndon Johnson) and 1976 (Walter Mondale). Nonetheless, I believe Biden will have a slight regional impact. To a certain extent, Biden helps the Democrats retain Pennsylvania and possibly gain Virginia. With Biden, I think all of the Northeast including New Hampshire goes to Obama. Outside the Northeast, I think Biden helps the Democrats retain Michigan and possibly gain Ohio, Iowa, or Florida. Biden certainly doesn't hurt in those areas. For the most part, whatever Obama wins in the West (in addition to WA, OR, and CA) can be credited to Obama or Howard Dean.

Having Biden on the ticket (at age 65) certainly doesn't play well for the future of the Democratic Party, but it does leave the possibility for Clinton to run in 2016 or even 2012. But the party may be much different by then and Clinton may very well be out of the loop. Anyway, planning for the future of the party doesn't always work out well. Remember Gore's attempt to carry the mantle?

What about Clinton?
I'm very pleased that Obama did not give in to the pressure to select Clinton as his running mate. If anything represents more of the same, it's the Clinton brand of politics, and in order for change to take place, the cycle of Bush-Clinton had to be broken. Since 1980, there has been a Bush or Clinton as Vice President or President; 28 years is more than enough. Ultimately, Obama has to sink or swim on his own, and I'm sure he realized he couldn't do this with the Clintons tied to his presidency. If Obama loses, he will have done so on his terms and with dignity.

What about McCain?
I still believe McCain's best choice is Romney, but I suspect he might pick Rob Portman of Ohio, or Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania to counter Obama-Biden in the Northeast and Great Lakes region. Portman is somewhat risky because of his ties to the Bush administration, and Ridge is risky because he is Pro-Abortion and he also has ties to the Bush administration. In the end, I believe McCain will decide to go with the person he is most comfortable with. That means his pick is probably Ridge.

Wild-cards include a female VP or even Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. I don't think McCain would be very comfortable with a female running mate, but Lieberman would certainly be an interesting choice. Lieberman would certainly help the ticket appeal to older white Democrats, but the Republican base will reject his more liberal social views (gay rights, gun control, stem cell research, Social Security, etc).

Obama-Biden vs.
McCain-Ridge???

Monday, August 11, 2008

It's Wesley Clark?

Here were my top 5 predictions for Democratic VP in June:
1. John Edwards
2. Wesley Clark
3. Tim Kaine
4. Jim Webb
5. Hillary Clinton

Since Edwards has disqualified himself due to Clintonesque behaviors, Wesley Clark steps into first place as my top prediction for Democratic VP. It makes a lot of sense when you consider the recent events involving Russia and Georgia in addition to a possible air strike of Iran by Israeli forces. In the post-9/11 world, events are becoming even more complicated, and Wesley Clark would certainly help Obama appear as though he is "ready to lead" militarily.

My Predictions:
Obama-Clark '08 for the Democrats
McCain-Romney '08 for the Repbublicans

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Obama Disappoints

Preface: (The purpose of this entry is to highlight the fact that it is absolutely necessary to hold politicians accountable. It's much better to disagree with the person you voted for than to blindly follow without critical analysis; something many Republicans and Democrats have had difficulty with recently.)

Obama, after securing his party's nomination, has moved to the right. What's disappointing about this move is that it represents more of the same old politics, the kind he is apparently running against. Ultimately, I realize that Obama is trying to appeal to a broader base in order to win the election. Unfortunately, this means he sacrifices principle in favor of calculation, which only serves to confuse his base and others. Is Obama paying lip service to the right or is he geniune? There wouldn't be any confusion if he stood by his principles. (Issues of concern include FISA, public funding for campaign, and off shore drilling.)

One is certainly entitled to change his or her opinions after long deliberations, and in many cases one should change course regardless of the political consequences. In politics, timing, image, and perception mean everything, and in the case of Obama's recent changes, he certainly appears to be calculating his moves at the expense of principles. To me, this is a disappointment. For others, it may be a pleasant surprise. Nonetheless, I still plan to vote for Obama for a variety of reasons including McCain's well-documented list of transformations since his true Maverick run against Bush in 2000.
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops

Excerpt from The Nation:
"Now Obama is not only putting politics ahead of principle--he's also calculating the politics wrong. The fact is, his stance in February helped him win a landslide victory in the Wisconsin primary, just as Feingold's principled but lonely stand against the Patriot Act helped him win overwhelming re-election in 2004. Obama inspired the support of millions when he refused to play the politics of fear and called on us to heed the better angels of our nature. He risks endangering that support when he plays the politics of calculation."
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080721/editors

Monday, June 02, 2008

Updated Look at Possible Vice Presidents

On May 10, I posted this about possible Vice Presidents. Since then, I have made a few small changes. These are my final predictions.

Republicans (McCain)
1. Mitt Romney because he helps McCain keep Colorado and Nevada Republican, and he puts Minnesota, Michigan, and Massachusetts in play. Based on this alone, McCain would be silly not to offer the vice presidency to him. Hopefully, some Republicans can get over his Mormonism.

2. Mike Huckabee because McCain still has problems with the Religious Right. Additionally, Huckabee helps McCain retain Iowa and helps keep the Democrats out of the South. Will the Religious Right stay home if Huckabee's not on the ticket?

3. Mark Sanford of South Carolina drops slightly due to Huckabee's name recognition and religious appeal. Sanford's positives are his youth (for future of party) and his current status of being a Washington outsider.

4. Charlie Crist's stock has dropped considerably because McCain might very well be able to retain Florida for the Republicans without the current governor. And although Crist is only 51, he looks much older.

5. Joe Lieberman stays in his original position.

Will McCain choose someone he is more comfortable with or will he choose the candidate most likely to put states in play despite any real or perceived animosity? I suspect McCain is reasonable enough to overlook any ill feelings between himself and Romney. But will the Religious Right support a rebel and a Mormon? Not sure, but I believe the Religious Right might find more in common with McCain and Romney than they suspect. That is, if they take the time to look.

Other Possibilities:
Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota
Jim Gibbons of Nevada
Bobby Jindal of Louisiana
Rick Perry of Texas
JC Watts of Oklahoma
Condoleezza Rice
Colin Powell
Rudy Guiliani of New York

Democrats (Obama)
1. John Edwards has moved up because he helps bridge the gap between Obama, Clinton, and working class whites. Additionally, Edwards is a household name which helps the ticket overcome some worries about Obama's unknown elements. And Edwards totally fits Obama's theme of change because he has changed his view on the Iraq War.

2. Wesley Clark has moved up because he might help the ticket solidify the support of Clinton voters, and his military credentials alone are worthy of vice presidential consideration. But I'm still concerned about his political skills.

3. Tim Kaine of Virginia slips slightly because his unknowns coupled with those of Obama might be too much for America to accept at once. Nonetheless, I believe he is a highly qualified candidate.

4. Jim Webb has dropped considerably due to his views on women, which is not likely to sit well with many Clinton supporters, among others.

5. Hillary Clinton retains the 5th spot due to her political gravitas, but she certainly does not fit Obama's theme of change. And her own comments concerning Obama's presidential qualifications and his possible assassination may preclude her vice presidency.

Other Possibilities:
Al Gore of Tennessee
Evan Bayh of Indiana
Ted Strickland of Ohio
Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania
Joe Biden of Delaware
Chris Dodd of Connecticut
Mark Warner of Virginia
Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas
Bill Richardson of New Mexico
Chuck Hagel of Nebraska

In addition to selecting Edwards for VP, Obama should announce whom he would like to select for his cabinet. This would help calm concerns about what an Obama presidency would look like and generate excitement among the base.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

The band...

The band...named Beirut...